ADA digital litigation: a real defense at honest rates.

Title III of the ADA prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation. Courts have extended that standard to websites, and the DOJ has proposed WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the compliance benchmark for private businesses. That's a legitimate legal obligation. What isn't legitimate is the serial-plaintiff industry that has grown up around it: the same law firms, the same plaintiffs, hundreds of boilerplate complaints, all targeting businesses that can't afford to litigate.

These cases are, frankly, ridiculous — a weaponization of civil-rights law for shakedown purposes. We handle them anyway, because small businesses deserve a real defense, and because the attorneys sending these demand letters are counting on their targets to roll over.

We offer reduced rates for startups and small businesses facing ADA digital-accessibility claims. If you've received a demand letter or complaint, contact us before you respond to anything.

• Demand-letter response: evaluate the claim, assess your actual exposure, and respond in a way that doesn't concede anything you don't have to.
• Plaintiff pattern analysis: serial filers have track records. We research the law firm and plaintiff to understand how their cases typically resolve and how judges have responded to their complaints.
• Website accessibility audit: technical review of your site against WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards — we read code, not just automated scan reports.
• Litigation defense: motions to dismiss, standing challenges, and full defense through trial when settlement doesn't make sense.
• Remediation strategy: where compliance work makes sense, we help you prioritize what actually matters legally versus what's a nice-to-have.
• Settlement negotiation: when the math points toward settlement, we negotiate from a position of informed strength — not fear.

Our principal is a licensed California attorney and a software engineer. That combination matters here: we can evaluate what your website actually does, not just what a demand letter claims it doesn't do.